Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8026 13
Original file (NR8026 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NT OF THE NAVY

tr tin

 

BAN |
pocket No .NRO8026-13
c Aueuet 2074

SS fee

  

This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction

of Naval Record (DD Form 149).

A three-member panei of the Board for

Records, sitting in
application on 4 August 2014.
injustice were reviewed in ac

to the proceedings of this

regulations and procedures applicable

Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

of your application, together with all mate

support thereof, your naval
regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory

opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps {(HOMC} memo 1001

MMIB-2 of 17 Apr 9014, and HOMC memo 1001 MMIB-2 of 15 Jul 2014,

copies which were provided to you on 6 May 2014, and are being
so considered

provided to you now. Additionally, the Board al
your response to the A/O via email on 10 May 2014.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. in making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions .
accordingly, yout application has been denied. The names and

votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have

the Board reconsider its decision upon suomission of new and
other matter not previously considered by

st is important to keep in mind that
ttaches to all official records.

the Board. in this regard,
a presumption of regularity 4
=

Lcial

Fh
le

uently, when applying for a correction of am of
the applicant to demonstrate the

Cons eg
burden is on

naval record, che

Sincerely,
— g& Se Ted.
7 eee

fe, ¥ "A
ROBERT D. Z5ALMAN

Acting Rrecutive Director

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3429 14

    Original file (NR3429 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3429-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0770 14

    Original file (NR0770 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 4050 LPb-2 dated 5 May 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3788 13

    Original file (NR3788 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4499 14

    Original file (NR4499 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval ord and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR4499-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2618 14

    Original file (NR2618 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIQ dated 23 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1865 14

    Original file (NR1865 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR-2 dated 11 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5471 14

    Original file (NR5471 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on _ 8 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 23 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR5471-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6014 14

    Original file (NR6014 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NkRé014-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR998 14

    Original file (NR998 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR- 3 dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. In this Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3276 14

    Original file (NR3276 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3276-14 rrection of an official naval Consequentiy, when applying for a co demonstrate the existence De record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.